<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data set competitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pixeltje.be/2008/09/data-set-competitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pixeltje.be/2008/09/data-set-competitions/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on image processing, reproducible research, and science in general</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xiaolin</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixeltje.be/2008/09/data-set-competitions/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Xiaolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixeltje.be/?p=60#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree with your thought about the data set problem, since I encountered the same difficulty in my research. When I wanted to compare my algorithm with others for video coding, it is almost impossible for me to find a common test set that others used. And most of the algorithms proposed can not be found on the authors' websites, which makes comparison very difficult. I really think research should be made more 'transparent' and open to competition!
So I like your idea of 'data set competition'. Although not only the 'best' algorithms should be appreciated, new concept/trial/idea can also be promoted, providing benchmark is definitely something useful to do.:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree with your thought about the data set problem, since I encountered the same difficulty in my research. When I wanted to compare my algorithm with others for video coding, it is almost impossible for me to find a common test set that others used. And most of the algorithms proposed can not be found on the authors&#8217; websites, which makes comparison very difficult. I really think research should be made more &#8216;transparent&#8217; and open to competition!<br />
So I like your idea of &#8216;data set competition&#8217;. Although not only the &#8216;best&#8217; algorithms should be appreciated, new concept/trial/idea can also be promoted, providing benchmark is definitely something useful to do.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

